|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
It would seem that February
fever is beginning to take its toll on what passes for reality these days. It all started when the pundits
of prurience and signatories to sexlessness discovered, thanks to a less than
ribald librarian, that Susan Patron in her award-winning children’s book,
“The High Power of Lucky,” used the word “scrotum” on the first page. Never
mind that it was the scrotum of a dog bitten by a snake that was involved.
No, the tut-tutters simply couldn’t abide the fact that children would come
face to face with a word that identifies what anyone, young or old, can see
on a male dog any time they care to look..
As a result, some libraries
have banned the book for no other reason than its inclusion of a perfectly
sound physiological term for a part of the male anatomy. As if that weren’t enough, when
a story about the Sex Workers Art Show at William & Mary appeared in the
Gazette two weeks ago, the truculence of the anti-cupidity crowd rumbled onto
the paper’s opinion pages and into the Last Word with a vengeance. “William & Mary has become
a moral black hole,” ventured one Last Worder, while another wondered, “How
would the college allow such a nasty subject to be the topic of its recent
choice of shows? Sex work is nothing to be praised or studied.” Still a third opined that “President Nichol
invites the sex industry to preach to impressionable children.” So inflamed has the spleen of
the party-poopers become that those paragons of right-wing rectitude, The
Washington Times and Fox News, have picked up the story and conjoined the sex
show with the Wren Chapel cross flap to further rail against the satanic and
libidinous ways of William & Mary president Gene Nichol. Well, let’s get a few things
straight. To begin with, the sex
industry, like the scrotum, is here to stay. And it is here to stay precisely
because those who find it “nasty” have allowed it to accrue unto itself an
almost unnatural erotic exoticism that exists only in activities forced
underground. As long as we consider strip teasers, prostitutes and sexually oriented body
parts constituents of a “moral black hole,” so long shall we perpetuate and
enhance the all too natural proclivities they represent. Second, to categorize students
at William & Mary as “impressionable children” is so far off the mark as
to be extra-terrestrial. Having taught on the college level for 36 years, I
can tell you that these kids know more about sexual activity, sexual diseases
and sexual risk than older adults did at their age. In fact, I suspect that
elementary school kids know more about sex now than I did when I was in
college. Parents should be delighted to
have their children talk about scrotums, as opposed to using some of the
other frisky terms bandied about on school grounds for the male and female
erogenous zones. Finally, Nichol did not invite
the sex workers to the college this year any more than Tim Sullivan invited
them in years past. Students at the college have their own funds for such
invitations, and, as it should be, censorship of their choices is
minimalized. Yet there are some on the right
who, because Nichol is an unabashed progressive and a member of the dreaded
ACLU, are determined to thwart his successes by consigning to him an aura of
moral incompetence and a lack of accountability. Their conflation of the issue
of the chapel cross with the sex workers is only one indication of the
illogical associations formed in the minds of those who, like muckraking
politicians, are determined to rely on ad hominem attacks and character
assassination to foment a clamor for the removal of one of the most popular
and forward-looking presidents the college has had in years. While Nichol may have acted too
hastily in removing the cross from the Wren Chapel, the incessant reactionary drumbeat that has
ensued is way out of proportion to the action he took. The cross has not
disappeared. It has not been hidden away. It is available at any time to
anyone who wants to use it. The point is that the college is
a much more diverse institution than it has ever been before. It is a secular
public entity that must adapt to and accept the social and religious mores of
all its students. And this Nichol, to his credit, understands. As for the Sex Workers Art
Show, let’s grow up. It was an innocuous, sometimes bawdy presentation of a
type of revelry that people have been participating in throughout history.
Compared to the overtly sexual plays of the Greek comedian Aristophanes, the
novels of Balzac or the drawings of Aubrey Beardsley it was pretty benign
stuff. And from what I understand, the
word scrotum was never mentioned. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
lewleadbeater.com Copyright 2002 All Rights Reserved email: LWL@lewleadbeater.com |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||