|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
An open letter to Representative Jo Ann Davis (R-1st) I noted with interest that your
views coincide with those of the Virginia legislature in terms of support for
President Bush’s proposed amendment to the Constitution banning gay marriage.
Flying in the face of all those irritating scientific studies proving that
homosexuality is found just as frequently amongst flora and fauna as it is
among humans, you courageously came right out and said that it “defies
natural law.” And I couldn’t agree more. We obviously are both attuned
to that now famous verse in Leviticus (20:13) which warns that “any man who
lies with a male as with a woman is an abomination and should be put to
death.” On the other hand, we can’t allow those nitpickers who claim that
it’s impossible to lie with a male as with a woman to deter us. We all know
you can’t take the Bible literally.
The Bush amendment, however, is
atrociously precise. The idea that states will not be required to confer
marital status on “unmarried couples or groups” certainly represents a
sweeping reform. Not only will all gay or straight unmarried couples have to
remain unhitched, but the inclusion of “groups” will put a stop to all those
pesky marriage applications from the Daughters of the Confederacy, the League
of Women Voters, the sleazily liberal Moose Lodge and Unitarians. But what I really wanted to
talk to you about is this. Since we seem to be in the mood to bring the
Constitution in line with biblical statutes, shouldn’t we be considering some
of the following as amendments to that august document? In Leviticus 24:44, for
instance, we’re told that it’s perfectly legal to own male and female slaves,
but that we must buy them from nations “round about” us. With a new
amendment, we in Williamsburg could re-establish our long-missed historic
slave market and make a mint selling off Mexicans and Canadians to the
highest bidders. This might necessitate
preemptive slave strikes on Montreal or Tijuana, but there’s good
precedent for that now. And I don’t know how things are
in York Co., but here in James City there are entirely too many blemished
people pussy-footing their way into church these days. This is clearly
contrary to God’s law, since in Leviticus 21:16-23 we are cautioned that
people who are blind, lame, have poor eyesight, crushed testicles or are
dwarfs profane the sanctuary of God. While I have no idea what crushed
testicles are, I do know that some religious scofflaws are using stilts and
contact lenses to hide their blemishes and canoodle their way into churches.
We need either an amendment to correct this or at least an extension of the
Patriot Act that would allow Attorney General Ashcroft to subpoena the
records of woodworkers and optometrists.
Again, in Leviticus 20:2, we’re
told that anyone who gives his child to Moloch should be put to death. As you
know, Moloch was a cannibalistic fire god. Here, however, he obviously is
being used as a metaphor for the public schools, and we all know what an
abomination they’ve become. What we definitely need is an amendment granting
vouchers to all who agree to attend preferably religious private schools. In
fact, I suggest that parents who send their kids to public schools either be
stoned or have their testicles crushed. And we could certainly pare
down some of the preposterous costs for Medicare and Medicaid if we followed
the principles of Leviticus 19:32. There we’re told “not to rise up before
the hoary head and honor the face of an old man.” The problem is that there
are too many seniors living too long these days. Perhaps an amendment could
be constructed whereby we reinstitute the time-honored practice of consigning
people 65 and older to ice floes in the arctic. That would certainly solve
the business of having to honor the faces of all the old geezers looking for
government handouts. Or we could just send them all over to Moloch’s place. Then too, and in conjunction with
President Bush’s courageous decision to cut back on meat inspections, we
might well have an amendment to ban the eating of shell fish and flesh
containing blood (Leviticus 19:26).
Dennis Kucinich would be a good one to bring on board relative to
this. And, like many parents, my
buddy Homer Simpson over at the High Noon Saloon desperately wants to sell
his rebellious teenagers into slavery. This is quite in harmony with God’s
law (Exodus 21:7), but what we need is an amendment that will stipulate price
ranges, since no one seems to know how many ephahs kids are going for these
days. Or, since we Republicans now
seem to have the will and wherewithal to do away with all that messy equal
rights business in the Constitution, perhaps we should just scrap the whole
thing and go back to the good old days when people were stoned for just about
everything from working on the sabbath to getting tattooed. It’s all so much
easier when you can decide who’s in and who’s out on the basis of the laws
for life in the Good Book. Yours, Lew |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
lewleadbeater.com Copyright 2002 All Rights Reserved
email: LWL@lewleadbeater.com |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||