|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
It is rather sad that the
passing of Mildred Loving on May 2nd slipped by virtually
unnoticed. Little mention of it was made on newscasts, and those papers that
took note of her death consigned the news to the obituary pages. Even sadder is the fact that
few of us know who Mildred Loving was. Yet it was she, a young black
woman, who with her husband Richard, an equally young white man, fought all
the way to the Supreme Court for their right to live as a married couple in The couple had married in A county judge found them in
violation of the Virginia Racial Integrity Act, the state’s
anti-miscegenation law, and banned them from The case went from there to the
Virginia Supreme Court in 1965. That court upheld the local ruling with the
now inconceivable justification that it was bound to “preserve the racial
integrity of its citizens” and prevent “a mongrel breed of citizens.” Following this ruling, Mildred
Loving wrote to then Attorney General Robert Kennedy, who in turn put her in
touch with two fledgling lawyers working for the Virginia ACLU. They took the case, now known
as Loving vs. While Richard Loving died in
1975, Mildred lived to see the day when there are over 4 million legally
married interracial couples in the That many of these couples now
live in Virginia – and not a few in the Williamsburg area – is testimony to
the incredible risks the Lovings took to solidify their love and to raise a
family in the state in which they were born.
One need only look at this
year’s prom photos from local high schools to see that the impact of the
Loving case, when combined with the successful integration of schools as a
result of Brown vs. Board of Education, has radically challenged and changed
entrenched puritanical views relative to racial mixing and interracial
dating. No longer need we look aghast
at young interracial couples holding hands in high school halls or dancing
together on prom nights. No longer can
we rationally fear resultant “mongrel breeds of citizens” when blacks, whites
or Asians turn amorously toward partners of other races. Thanks in no small part to the
Lovings, we have finally grasped the fact that the arrows of Eros target more
the internal complexities of the heart than the superficialities of external
skin color. In a recent column in the New
York Times, Paul Krugman noted that “Mr. Obama’s nomination wouldn’t have
been possible 20 years ago. It’s possible today only because racial division,
which has driven Obama himself is the product of
an interracial marriage and, as a result, has suffered at the hands of some
voters. Two out of ten voters in the Despite Obama’s intellectual
successes at How ironic it is, then, that in
the state in which the Lovings fought so valiantly to live as a married
couple Krugman’s racial assessment may have some merit. Despite his interracial
heritage, not only did Obama win While such predictions may be
overly sanguine, the fact is that Whether he wins or not, Obama
is indebted to Mildred and Richard Loving, as well as to all those who fought
so fiercely to overcome the state’s massive resistance to racial equality,
for the chance to subdue at least one squadron of the racist phalanx that
constituted the bulwark of the Solid South.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
lewleadbeater.com Copyright 2002 All Rights Reserved email: LWL@lewleadbeater.com |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||